Pitney Bowes.

USPS® News You Can Use

The USPS responds to PRC’s decision to remand the Full-Service IMb mandate

by Janet Lockhart-Jones, Ed.D., MDC | December 2, 2013 | No Comments

Docket # R2013-10, submitted by the Postal Service to the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC), contained the agency’s official response to PRC Order 1890. In that Order, the PRC determined that the rates proposed for First-Class Mail®, Standard Mail®, and Periodicals would be inconsistent with the annual price cap limitation as calculated under 39 C.F.R. § 3010, if they were concurrently implemented with the planned Full-Service Intelligent Mail® barcode (IMb) requirements. To address the Commission’s finding, the Postal Service was given two options: 1) to implement the Full-Service IMb™ requirement contemporaneously with the proposed rates and submit revised billing determinants/prices accordingly; or 2) to not implement the Full Service IMb requirement contemporaneously with the proposed rates, thus allowing the proposed prices to take effect without further adjustment. The Postal Service was directed to notify the Commission of how it planned to address the Commission’s finding no later than November 29, 2013.

The Postal Service’s response, dated November, 29, 2013 to the PRC stipulates that it has elected to defer the implementation date that the Full-Service IMb requirements would change access to automation rates, until a date after 2014.Draft_Fed_REg

In a draft edition of an upcoming Federal Register Notice, the USPS stipulates this further.  Click on the image to the right to read the DRAFT Federal Register Notice.

For the full draft of the USPS Response to the PRC, click here: http://www.prc.gov/Docs/88/88458/CPI%20Remand%20Response%20%5BFINAL%5D.pdf

 

 

The following are among the trademarks owned by the United States Postal Service: First-Class™, First-Class Mail®, IM™, IMb™, Intelligent Mail®, Intelligent Mail Package Barcode (IMpb™), ACS™, Priority Mail Express™, PC Postage®, Post Office™, Postal Service™, Priority Mail®, Standard Mail®, United States Postal Service®, U.S. Mail®, U.S. Postal Service®, USPS®, USPS Electronic Postmark®. This is not a comprehensive list of all Postal Service trademarks.

 

Please observe our community guidelines when posting comments.

This blog is hosted by Pitney Bowes Inc. By using this blog you agree that you are solely responsible for any comment you post to the Blog and you agree to abide and be bound by the Pitney Bowes TERMS OF USE.

Please stay on topic. We may redirect certain submissions if they are better handled through another channel such as customer service. With regard to the content of any submissions you make through this Blog, you agree to remain solely responsible and agree to not submit materials that are unlawful, defamatory, abusive or obscene. You also agree that you will not submit anything to this Blog that violates any right of a third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights.

Pitney Bowes reserves the right to terminate your ability to use and/or submit posts to this Blog. Pitney Bowes may not review all postings and is not responsible for comments posted on this Blog. Pitney Bowes nevertheless retains the right to not post, edit a posting or to remove any postings in its sole and absolute discretion.

Comments (none)

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>